The Unraveling of Public Science The Unraveling of Public Science How one year dramatically changed the federal science landscape Jump to: Government-Wide Biomedical Research and Public Health Food and Agriculture Environment and Public Land Scientific Discovery and Innovation The Trump administration embarked on an all-out assault on public science after assuming power in January 2025, driving out tens of thousands of federal employees engaged in scientific endeavors, halting critical research and life-saving clinical trials as well as canceling grants and funding for programs affecting public health, the environment, food, the weather, agricultural research and space exploration. Over the years, government funding to universities and scientists along with a wide array of federal programs and research have produced extraordinary scientific advances, led to the development of new medicines for deadly and debilitating diseases, increased life expectancy, safeguarded communities facing public health threats, protected the nation’s air, land and water, enhanced our understanding of the universe and improved agricultural production. While some of the cutbacks initiated during 2025 have been overturned by the courts or have been modified by Congress, there remain substantial reductions in funding, a serious loss of talent, numerous leadership vacancies across the government and politicizing decisions that go against expert recommendations that affect science, public health and the environment. Over the last year, the Partnership for Public Service has documented the Trump administration’s unprecedented efforts to dismantle federal institutions, funding streams and infrastructure. This product brings together data and stories that highlight the impact of these actions on federal agencies conducting and supporting critical scientific work and outcomes. In the coming months, we will continue to track how the federal science landscape is changing and provide the public, the media and policymakers with a reliable resource to better understand the value of the federal scientific community and the risks ahead if the damage continues. If you are interested in working with the Partnership to show your support for federal science, we invite you to share this resource or contact us by filling out the form below. SHARE WITH YOUR NETWORKS Communications toolkit Government-Wide The federal government supports Americans by investing in science. This includes conducting world-class research at agencies like the National Institutes of Health and NASA to funding scientific innovation through grants to universities, nonprofits, private companies and state and local governments. Every day, career civil servants play a critical role in ensuring the safety of the food we eat and the availability of life saving medicines to mitigating the impact of natural disasters and public health outbreaks. The workforce of all science agencies combined decreased by 94,999 employees between Sept. 2024, before the start of the second Trump administration and Dec. 2025, a 11.9% decrease. Employees separated from science agencies through a reduction in force totaled 3,622. This accounted for slightly more than 1/3 (34.5%) of RIFs government wide. Science agencies obligated $112.6 billion in project grants in fiscal 2025, a 24.1% decrease from fiscal 2024. Government-wide, agencies obligated $16.5 billion in scientific research and development contracts in fiscal 2025, a 23.0% decrease from fiscal 2024. Consequences of Cuts Federal government agencies lose over 10,000 employees with STEM Ph.Ds. From December 2024 to the end of 2025, 10,109 employees with Ph.Ds. in science, technology, engineering, math and health have left the federal workforce, taking decades of experience with them. While the Office of Personnel Management classifies most of the departures as voluntary, the Trump administration’s actions likely played a large role in the exodus as many feared being fired, disagreed with policy stances and/or took incentives like buyouts. The highest percentages of departures compared to the total Ph.D., workforce were seen at the National Science Foundation, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy. The highest total number of departures were at the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Read the full story (Source: Science) Read more Federal data collection and distribution has been disrupted by the Trump administration The federal government has long been known for providing reliable data across sectors, but with the Trump administration’s changes there have been more than 3,000 data sets removed from public access. From complete terminations to regular disruptions, experts worry about the elimination and the quality of the remaining available data. For example, as of April 2025, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has stopped releasing data on maternal and infant mortality, and in September, the Department of Agriculture canceled a report on household food security. Part of the disruptions include workforce reductions, with agencies losing anywhere from 10% to 30% of their data staff. “We as a nation will be in a real bind if we don’t have access to those primary data that only the federal government has the scope and the scale and the resources to produce,” Denice Ross, the former U.S. chief data scientist under the Biden administration, told NOTUS. “There’s just no replacement for the complete and fair collection of data that the federal government is in charge of.” Read the full story (Source: NOTUS) Read more Federal contract cuts are hurting small businesses that support American science Federal cuts to scientific research have strained small businesses that supply equipment, technology and services, leading to layoffs and lost revenue. Efforts within the last year to streamline federal contracts have instead limited competition, delayed payments and removed key advocates for small businesses within agencies. Grant cuts for university research programs also have impacted the market for specialized equipment. Environmental research and development also have been hit particularly hard and impacted businesses that produce atmospheric monitoring technology. “The administration also has pushed consolidation of contracts,” contract regulation expert and small business consultant Sam Le told Politico’s E&E news. “They’re taking smaller contracts and turning them into one larger contract. Often those are so large that small businesses can’t adequately compete.” Read the full story (Source: Politico) Read more Federal funding cuts impact American scientific research, bringing chaos and uncertainty Research across sectors has been disrupted as the federal government scales back its long-standing investment in science. Spending cuts and workforce reductions have halted research aimed at improving health and education outcomes. For example, canceled clinical trials at the NIH in 2025 impacted medical care for 74,000 people and affected disease research and prevention. Even as some funding has been restored through court orders and continued funding from Congress, the impact will be felt for years to come as studies are delayed and the pipeline for young scientists shrinks. Read the full story (Source: The Hill) Read more Biomedical Research and Public Health Government agencies support Americans by investing in biomedical research and strengthening public health efforts. This ranges from protecting against disease outbreaks, sponsoring clinical trials, advancing medical breakthroughs and providing health care to veterans, active-duty military and their families. See example government agencies. The workforce in these agencies decreased by 36,146 employees between Sept. 2024 and Dec. 2025, a 7.3% decline. Agencies in this sector obligated $43.3 billion in project grants in fiscal 2025, a 2.9% decrease from fiscal 2024. Obligations for scientific research and development contracts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention decreased by 79.0% from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025. Consequences of Cuts The loss of $230 million in federal funding has forced layoffs at the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services The funding cut caused the department to lay off 80 employees and dozens of contractors, impacting health initiatives statewide including HIV care, tobacco cessation, well-water testing and emergency services. The layoffs included 11 disease investigators responsible for tracking HIV cases in Charlotte and connecting newly diagnosed patients with care. Officials worry that the funding loss will hamper their ability to provide vaccines and care to patients in isolated communities. “Our state workforce is incredibly stressed,” said Kelly Kimple, a DHHS chief medical officer told the Carolina Public Press. “It’s like we’re trying to put a puzzle together but we’re missing half the pieces. Reductions disproportionately impact our rural communities that may have less resources available. It’s hard to effectively plan and ensure that we will be able to respond to future challenges.” Read the full story (Source: Carolina Public Press ) Read more Federal hiring freezes and workforce reductions have caused disruptions at VA hospitals At the Pittsburgh Veterans Administration (VA) hospital, federal hiring freezes and contract cuts have delayed experimental treatments for local veterans with advanced cancers of the mouth, throat and voice box and forced some facilities to operate without critical personnel. “They were ready to enroll,” said Alanna Caffas to the New York Times, the chief executive of the Veterans Health Foundation, which administers the clinical trials. “They had the lab kits on site. They had the drug to dispense. But they couldn’t get the clinical research coordinator renewed.” Read the full story (Source: New York Times) Read more Many of the CDC’s public communication channels that share information on disease outbreaks have gone silent The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) typically operates a robust network of communications, keeping health care providers, scientists and the public informed on important disease updates. The changing administration caused disruptions in posting on Department of Health and Human Services social media channels and prompted CDC newsletters to stop distribution, including the CDC’s Health Alert Network which dispatches alerts about disease outbreaks to health professionals. Additionally, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report for the first time did not release publications during the height of a wave of bird flu infections and the start of a measles outbreak in early 2025. “Public health functions best when its experts are allowed to communicate the work that they do in real time, and that’s not happening,” Kevin Griffis, former director of communications at the CDC, told NPR. “That could put people’s lives at risk.” Read the full story (Source: NPR) Read more Wisconsin public health organizations lost federal funding from the Department of Health and Human Services, decreasing the capacity to support those experiencing substance abuse and mental health challenges This past spring, the cancellation of $12 billion in Department of Health and Human Services grants to state health departments resulted in the loss of funding for several Wisconsin programs. One, Uplift Wisconsin, is a hotline answered by individuals who have experience with mental health or substance use challenges and is designed to support people before they reach a state of crisis. The hotline, known as the warmline, received more than 24,000 calls in 2024 and had been receiving $600,000 annually for three years but lost the last six months of its federal funding, disrupting services and triggering furloughs. “This is a resource that is going to be sorely missed,” Martina Gollin-Graves, president and CEO of Mental Health America of Wisconsin told the Wisconsin Public Radio. “I’m worried about the fallout and how people are going to get their needs met, now that they can’t use the warmline.” Read the full story (Source: WPR) Read more Food and Agriculture Government agencies support food safety and strong farms. This includes conducting food safety inspections and recalls that help prevent food-borne illnesses and investing in research that helps farmers and improves agricultural production. See example government agencies. The workforce in these agencies decreased by 11,529 employees between Sept. 2024 and Dec. 2025, a 22% decrease. Agencies in this sector obligated $712.9 million in project grants in fiscal 2025, a 54.6% decrease from fiscal 2024. Obligations for scientific research and development contracts at the Food and Drug Administration increased by 72.3% from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025. Consequences of Cuts Cuts to climate research funding have halted agricultural science aimed at providing a new cash crop for Colorado farmers Partnership for Climate Smart Commodities, a U.S. Department of Agriculture grant program that was terminated, brought over $900 million to Colorado to support conservation farming and ranching. Research projects on drought-resistant crops, soil health and greenhouse gas reduction remain unfinished, including work being done at the Colorado State University’s Soil Innovation Lab to study how farmers can effectively build supply for camelina, a seed that can be used to make sustainable jet fuel, which many Colorado farmers see as a promising new income stream. “That knowledge and that data is going to farmers and it’s supporting us in a way that no one else currently is,” farmer Roy Pfaltzgraff told KUNC. “How do you assign a dollar value to that? The value of knowing changes everything from now on.” Read the full story (Source: KUNC) Read more Cuts to agencies that oversee the food supply raise concerns about safety risks, including an increased likelihood of foodborne illness Staffing cuts have impacted federal food safety agencies, including the Food Safety and Inspection Service at the Department of Agriculture, which signs off on “USDA Inspected” stickers. Decisions from the administration are causing chaos, including the abrupt closing and reopening of two national food testing labs. Officials claim cuts are straining the workforce, causing food inspectors to visit double the number of facilities per day and raising concerns about how much food is legitimately earning the stamp of approval. Scientists have reported interruptions in routine produce testing and seafood inspections as well as shortages in basic lab testing supplies. Read the full story (Source: NPR) Read more The Institute of Agriculture at the University of Tennessee was hit hard as Trump cuts $37.7 million dollars across the school system The University of Tennessee school system has lost $37.7 million in federal grants, the majority of which impacts agricultural research and resources provided to Tennessee farmers. Grant cuts include a project that the university is sub-awarding across multiple states to help farmers and ranchers expand markets for climate-smart beef, dairy and small grazing animals. Read the full story (Source: Tennessee Lookout ) Read more Staff cuts have left the FDA with a reduced capacity and forced a scale back of food safety inspections The FDA chose to break with common practice and not name the lettuce grower or issue public alerts following an E.coli outbreak that sickened more than 80 people last spring. This failed publicization of a major outbreak has been attributed to agency changes made by the Trump administration, including a scaling back of safety alert specialists and rules. Additionally, the administration disbanded the Department of Justice unit that pursues cases against companies that sell contaminated food, causing experts to worry about accountability. Read the full story (Source: The Washington Post) Read more Environment and Public Land Government agencies support Americans by protecting and preserving our environment, public lands and natural resources. These efforts include water resource management, maintaining national parks, combatting pollution, mitigating disasters through wildfire prevention and emergency response. See example government agencies. The workforce in these agencies decreased by 41,224 employees between Sept. 2024 and Dec. 2025, a 20.6% decrease. Agencies in this sector obligated $36.8 billion in project grants in fiscal 2025, a 44.3% decrease from fiscal 2024. Obligations for scientific research and development contracts at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decreased by 100% from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025. Consequences of Cuts Major staff losses at the U.S. Forest Service are hindering efforts to prevent wildfires Data analysis shows that Forest Service work to reduce wildfires was down 40% in comparison to previous years, with only 1.7 million acres treated compared to an average of 3.6 million acres during past year. Disruptions and staffing cuts also have caused delays and reductions in the number of prescribed burns, which are carefully calculated and dependent on weather and time of year. Read the full story (Source: The Washington Post) Read more Laboratory that supports clean drinking water and protects the Great Lakes faces significant workforce and budget cuts despite its stellar reputation The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory lost 35% of its staff, including scientists with many years of expertise working in the region. The lab has been credited with preventing another crisis like the one in 2014 in Toledo, Ohio, where almost half a million people were told not to drink or touch the water. However, recent cuts and budget restrictions have harmed the lab’s ability to protect the public from toxic algae blooms that can contaminate drinking water. Read the full story (Source: ProPublica ) Read more Federal workforce cuts hit park rangers at Yosemite National Park, raising concerns about the ability to protect and preserve public lands There has been an estimated 25% drop in permanent staff across the National Parks Service, despite Yosemite National Park’s 2025 visitors reaching a high level compared to recent years. With fewer park rangers and staff to educate the public, there has been an increase in visitors’ engaging in rule-breaking activities like BASE jumping off cliffs, littering and flying drones. Workforce cuts also come at a time when search and rescue missions at Yosemite were up by 40% between January and July compared to the previous year, requiring intense missions from teams as they trek into backcountry areas. “There’s a lot of folks who are doing the jobs that three people used to do. Summers, in particular, our high season, really just crush people, because you have to be called out on overtime all the time. The search-and-rescue loads are intense. The traffic and parking, and Yosemite crowds is intense,” former Yosemite Superintendent Cicely Muldoon told E&E News. Read the full story (Source: E&E News ) Read more Trump administration eliminated nearly $4 million in federal funding for cutting-edge weather and climate research at Princeton University Funding cuts include the Cooperative Institute for Modeling the Earth’s system, a collaboration between Princeton University and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The institute studies how the ocean and atmosphere are changing, an analysis of how Earth’s water availability will fluctuate due to global warming, and a project that seeks to predict how changes in rainfall patterns and sea-level rise could affect coastal flooding. One of the program’s meteorologists is Syukuro Manabe, a Nobel laureate in physics whose work models Earth’s climate and predicts the effects of global warming. Read the full story (Source: The New York Times) Read more Initiative to eliminate invasive tree species left in limbo as a nonprofit loses already-awarded federal grants The South-Central Indiana nonprofit, the Lake Monroe Water Fund, lost a grant of more than $200,000 from the U.S. Forest Service to support the removal of invasive tree species and rebuilding the native ecosystem. With the loss of already-awarded funding, the nonprofit is unable to access several matching grants at the state and county level that make up its $400,000 budget. Without this support, the team will have to halt the project entirely, harming the ability to repopulate the Yellowwood State Forest. Read the full story (Source: Limestone Post Magazine ) Read more Scientific Discovery and Innovation Government agencies support Americans by investing in scientific discovery and innovation to drive jobs, global competitiveness and economic growth. This ranges from advancing America’s space missions, protecting against cybersecurity threats, and conducting cutting-edge research to support our energy needs. See example government agencies. The workforce in these agencies decreased by 6,037 employees between Sept. 2024 and Dec. 2025, a 13.3% decrease. Agencies in this sector obligated $31.8 billion in project grants in fiscal 2025, a 12% decrease from fiscal 2024. Obligations for scientific research and development contracts at the National Institute of Standards and Technology increased by 108.4% from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025. Consequences of Cuts American competitiveness and innovation halted as Trump administration canceled funding for a lower-carbon cement plan despite strong economic demand Amid surging demand for lower-carbon cement, the Trump administration’s cancellation of $500 million to the Heidelberg plant in Mitchell, Ind., is costing the area hundreds of jobs and the country’s competitive edge in cutting carbon emissions from cement manufacturing. This plant would have significantly increased cement production by as much as 40%, which would support the growing international demand and the needs of domestic buyers who currently rely on imports for 20% of their purchases. Read the full story (Source: The Washington Post) Read more Trump administration pulls back $1.1 billion grant for an already approved semiconductor facility The Department of Commerce canceled a previously established public, private partnership with the nonprofit Netcast and Arizona State University to build a $1.1 billion National Semiconductor Technology Center prototyping facility. “We need answers from the Trump administration on how this announcement will affect the research and development facility at ASU, an investment widely supported by Arizona’s leaders – both Democrats and Republicans,” Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said in a statement to KJZZ News. “We must ensure that the research for the next generation of microchips happens in America.” Read the full story (Source: KJZZ Phoenix ) Read more Trump administration fires almost 250 employees from Colorado’s premiere energy research lab The National Laboratory of the Rockies in Golden, Colo. has recently undergone a name change in combination with its firing of researchers and operational staff. Following Trump administration directives, the name was changed from the National Renewable Energy Lab while 114 employees were let go in May 2025 and 134 employees were fired in February 2026. The workforce cuts will impact the premier international research lab’s facilities and experiments, including the improvement of energy sources like wind turbines and solar photovoltaic cells as well as innovative transportation fuel. The administration plans to use this and other labs’ federal lands for use by private data centers and power plant companies. Read the full story (Source: Colorado Sun ) Read more Federal scientists who produce measurements of atomic elements were fired from the National Institutes of Standards and Technology The National Institutes of Standards and Technology’s world class laboratory, the Atomic Spectroscopy Group, is critical to the advancement of microchips, medical devices and space discovery. The lab’s findings have been critical to studies across science disciplines, being regularly cited in research papers around the world. The team was rehired in contractor roles at NASA, but with the disruption it will likely take over a year and a half to have the teams’ experiments operational again. Read the full story (Source: The New York Times) Read more DATA DEFINITIONS Data for each of the scientific sectors above are calculated using a custom classification system created by the Partnership. These sectors were determined based on organizational missions and are intended to reflect the breadth of the federal government’s activity and funding in each thematic sector. Agencies included in each sector are: Biomedical Research and Public Health: National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Indian Health Service, Health Resources and Services Administration, Veterans Health Administration, Defense Health Agency, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Naval Medical Command, U.S. Army Medical Command, Air Force Medical Command Food and Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Economic Research Service, National Agricultural Statistics Service, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Food and Nutrition Service, Foreign Agricultural Service, Farm Service Agency, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Food and Drug Administration Environment and Public Lands: National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, U.S. Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Army Corps of Engineers Scientific Discovery and Innovation: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Energy, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Science and Technology Directorate (DHS), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Workforce data are drawn from the Office of Personnel Management’s Federal Workforce Data site and its predecessor, Fedscope. Year-over-year changes are calculated from September 2024 and December 2025 workforce numbers. Grants and contracts data are derived from USASpending’s assistance and contracts datasets for awards in fiscal years 2024 and 2025. Grant values reflect federal obligations for project grants. Obligations refer to money that government has promised to spend, either immediately or in future, by signing a contract, awarding a grant or placing an order for a product or service. Scientific contract values reflect federal obligations for research and development contracts in the fields of agriculture, energy, natural resources and environment, general science and technology, health, and space as defined by the General Services Administration’s product and service codes for fiscal 2025 and the Partnership’s sector classification system. Sector-wide totals reflect only agencies and subcomponents with available data and may not include all organizations within a sector. “Government-wide” data refers to all federal agencies for which data is available. “Science agencies” refers to the agencies across the four science sectors as defined above. Get Involved We invite you to join the Partnership for Public Service in showing your support for the federal scientific community and investments in public science. Please fill out this form if you or your organization are interested in learning more about our work or would like to deepen your engagement through storytelling, speaking or volunteer opportunities. Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Email * name Email Last First nameLast nameSubmit